Treating hazarous materials

ABSTRACT

Methods of treating hazardous materials, such as, for example, contaminated soils, are disclosed. In one aspect, a method may include treating a contaminated soil with a hazardous material treatment composition to form a resulting material. In one aspect, the hazardous material treatment composition may include mostly salt, and from 0.5 to 15 wt % sorbent. The method may further include treating the resulting material with one or more inorganic binding agents. Other methods of treating hazardous materials are also disclosed, as well as compositions for treating hazardous materials.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority from and fully incorporatesherein, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/676,062 entitled“TREATING MATERIALS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS”, filed on Apr. 29, 2005.The U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/676,062 is incorporatedherein by reference.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

Embodiments of the invention pertain to methods and compositions fortreating hazardous materials. In particular, embodiments of theinvention pertain to methods and compositions for treating contaminatedsoils.

2. Background Information

Tremendous volumes of soil worldwide are contaminated with hazardousmaterials, such as, for example, oil-derived hydrocarbons, and heavymetals, to name just a few examples. Soil remediation is a process bywhich the soil may be treated in order to reduce the level of hazardousmaterials in the soil. Large sums of money are spent on soilremediation.

There are numerous approaches for remediating contaminated soils.Representative approaches include, but are not limited to, biologicaltreatment to biologically alter the hazardous materials, air strippingto strip the hazardous materials from the soil with air, soil washing towash the contaminants from the soil, solvent extraction to extract thecontaminants from the soil with a solvent, vitrification in which thecontaminates are locked into the soil with vitrification, vacuumextraction in which a vacuum is used to extract the contaminants fromthe soil, and thermal desorption in which heat is used to thermallydesorb the contaminants from the soil. The approaches may be performedeither in-situ or else soil may be excavated and transported to atreatment facility.

However, there are known disadvantages associated with each of theseapproaches. For example, biological treatment may tend to be relativelyspecific for certain contaminants and may face challenges when mixedcontaminants are present in the soil. Air stripping and vacuumextraction may be relatively ineffective when the contaminants have lowvolatility. Vitrification may tend to be challenging when the soil hasflammable materials and may tend to be costly in operation and capitalcost. Soil washing and solvent extraction tend to consume large volumesof water or solvent which then need to be processed and may tend to beexpensive. Thermal desorption may tend to be expensive and energyintensive.

Thus there is a general need in the art for new and useful hazardousmaterial treatment methods.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may best be understood by referring to the followingdescription and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrateembodiments of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a treated hazardous material within acontainment structure, according to one or more embodiments of theinvention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a method of treating a hazardous material,according to one or more embodiments of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of another method of treating a hazardousmaterial, according to one or more embodiments of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the invention pertain to methods of treating hazardousmaterials. Other embodiments of the invention pertain to compositions totreat the hazardous materials. Further embodiments of the inventionpertain to methods of making the compositions or methods of using thecompositions. Yet further embodiments of the invention pertain to shapedproducts formed using the compositions and/or the methods.

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth.However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may bepracticed without these specific details. In other instances, well-knownstructures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not toobscure the understanding of this description.

I. Example Hazardous Material Containment Structure Having MultipleDifferent Mechanisms for Containment

FIG. 1 conceptually illustrates a treated hazardous material 100, suchas, for example, a heavy metal, organic contaminant, or the like, withina containment structure 110, 120, 130, according to one or moreembodiments of the invention. The containment structure includes azeolite (or other sorbent) 110, a salt crystal/soil matrix 120, and acement (or other inorganic binding agent or hardening material) 130. Apotential advantage of the multi-layered containment structure is thathazardous material may be sealed in the zeolite or other sorbent andcontained by multiple different layers and mechanisms of containment.

The zeolite or sorbent may provide a first mechanism and material ofcontainment for the hazardous material. The hazardous material may beselectively drawn into or sorbed and chemically held or retained incavities or pores of the internal structure of the zeolite or othersorbent. Chemical bonds or interactions may be used to hold the ions ormolecules within the zeolites or other sorbents. By way of example,heavy metal cations and other ions may be coordinated within the zeoliteby an ion exchange process and held by ionic chemical forces.

The salt/crystal/soil matrix may provide a second layered mechanism andmaterial of containment of the hazardous material. The zeolite or othersorbent may be coated or surrounded, at least partially, by a portion ofthe salt crystal/soil matrix. In the matrix, the crystals may be bondedwith surfaces of the soil. The salt crystals may also be formed in andmay tend to close off or block the pores or other openings of thezeolite or other sorbent. The salt crystal/soil within the pores maytend to be relatively dense and impenetrable by the hazardous materialand may tend to close or seal the hazardous material therein. In somecases remaining ions or other hazardous material may be incorporateddirectly into the salt crystals, which may further help to immobilizeand contain the hazardous material.

The cement or other inorganic binding agent or hardening material mayprovide a third outer mechanism and material layer of containment of thehazardous material. The cement may tend to coat, surround, and/orencapsulate the crystal/soil matrix. The cement may tend to fill in gapsin the crystal/soil matrix, and may tend to be formed in and close offremaining pores or other openings of the zeolite or other sorbent. Thismay further tend to close and seal the hazardous material within thecement. In some cases remaining ions or other hazardous material may beincorporated directly into the hardened cement by cementitiousreactions, which may further help to immobilize and contain thehazardous material.

The use of a layered containment structure including multiple differentmaterial layers and mechanisms of containment may help to immobilize andcontain the hazardous material. This may help to reduce leaching,migration, and other movement of the hazardous material.

A conceptual illustration of the sequential or layered containmentprocess and result for a single sorbent particle have been used forpurposes of illustration. It is to be appreciated that when dealing withreal materials and processes, perfect layering may not necessarilyalways be achieved. In addition, such layering may be formed aroundclumps or other groups of particles, rather than a single sorbentparticle.

II. Example Method for Treating Hazardous Materials

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a method 200 of treating a hazardousmaterial, according to one or more embodiments of the invention. Themethod includes treating the hazardous material with a compositionincluding a sorbent and a salt, at block 210. The sorbent may sorb atleast a portion of the hazardous material, and the salt may crystallizearound the sorbent to help encapsulate the hazardous material within thesorbent and/or the containment structure.

Then, the resulting treated hazardous material may be treated with aninorganic binding agent or hardening agent, such as, for example,cement, lime, tricalcium silicate, or other cementitious material, orcombination thereof, at block 220. The hardening material or bindingmaterial may harden around the sorbent and salt crystals and furtherhelp to encapsulate or seal the hazardous material within the sorbentand/or the containment structure.

III. Another Example Method for Treating Hazardous Materials

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of another method 300 of treating a hazardousmaterial, according to one or more embodiments of the invention.Examples of suitable hazardous materials that may be treated include,but are not limited to, contaminated soils, and industrial wastes orby-products or effluents. For purposes of illustration, theaforementioned method will be discussed largely in the context oftreating contaminated soil, although the scope of the invention is notso limited.

A. Preparation of Treatment Composition and Soil

Shortly prior to use, such as, for example, from several minutes toseveral hours before use, a hazardous material treatment composition asdisclosed elsewhere herein, may be combined with water, to form a thicksolid-liquid sludge, “mud”, or slurry, at block 310. The water of theslurry may be saturated or supersaturated with at least some of thesalts of the hazardous material treatment composition. Alternatively,water may be added to the soil, or to the mixture of the soil and thetreatment composition.

Contaminated soil may be shoveled, augered, mined, bulldozed, orotherwise removed from the contaminated site. By way of example, thesoils or other materials may be contaminated with hazardous materialsincluding, but not limited to, hydrocarbons (for example petroleum,petroleum derivatives, jet fuel, tars, gasoline, kerosene), halogenatedhydrocarbons (for example tetrachloroethylene), polychlorinatedbiphenyls, poly-aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, other organicpollutants, heavy metals (lead, cadmium, mercury, etc.), othercontaminants, and combinations thereof. If appropriate, the contaminatedsoil may optionally be introduced into the mixer and homogenized priorto treatment, although this is not required.

B. Mixing Hazardous Material with Treatment Composition and Water

Then, the sludge may be contacted with the contaminated soil and used totreat the contaminated soil. In one or more embodiments of theinvention, the hazardous treatment composition and contaminated soil maybe combined in a volume ratio that ranges from about 1:50 to 1:2,although the scope of the invention is not limited to these particularratios. In one aspect, the composition added may provide an amount ofzeolite that is sufficient to sorb the intended amount of thecontaminant.

Referring again to FIG. 3, the hazardous material, the hazardousmaterial treatment composition, and the water may be contacted andmixed, at block 320. In one or more embodiments of the invention, properproportions of the contaminated soil and sludge may be introduced intoand mixed in a mixer.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the mixer may include aplough mixer, although this is not required. Non-limiting examples of asuitable plough mixers are the L-20, KM-1200, or KM-2000 ploughshare®mixers, which are commercially available from Lodige USA, Inc, ofRonkonkoma, N.Y., having the parent company of Warburg, Germany. Theploughshare® mixers may mix the components by utilizing a mechanicallyinduced fluidized bed reportedly created by shovels that rotate close toinner walls of a drum and thrust the components inside the drum. In oneor more embodiments of the invention, such mixers may be operated atfrom about 50 to 300 revolutions per minute (rpm) to achieve a FroudeNumber ranging from about 6 to 8, such as from 6 to 7, although this isnot required.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the contaminated soil andtreatment composition may be mixed under such conditions for a period oftime that is less than about 10 minutes, or less than about 7 minutes,such as, for example, from about 2 to 7 minutes. Often, the period oftime is from about 3 to 6 minutes, and may be less than 5 minutes.

A potential advantage of using such plough mixers is that they mayachieve comparatively good mixing of the contents of the drum in arelatively short period of time, which may tend to be compatible withthe treatment processes described herein. The mixing action may alsohelp to avoid separation of the salt crystals from around the zeolites.However, the scope of the invention is not limited to just these typesof mixers. Other types of mixers may also optionally be used. Forexample, Hobart dough mixers have been tested and found to be suitable.In one aspect, the mixer may optionally be provided on a mobileplatform, such as, for example, a bed of a vehicle, or a trailer, andmoved to a remediation site and used there, although this is notrequired.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the temperature in themixer during the mixing process may be controlled to be in the range ofabout 80 to 120° F., although this is not required. Some of the heat maybe provided by exothermic processes and additional heating and/orcooling may also optionally be used.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the amount of water in themixer during this stage of mixing may be adjusted or prescribed to be inthe range of 10 to 20 wt %, such as, for example, from 12 to 16 wt %. Adeflocculant such as sodium silicate may optionally be included and mayallow reduction in water content, if desired. However, the scope of theinvention is not limited in this respect.

C. Sorbing Hazardous Material with Sorent

Referring again to FIG. 3, during the mixing period, and potentiallyshortly thereafter, the zeolites or other sorbents of the treatmentcomposition may sorb at least a portion of the hazardous materials ofthe soil, at block 330. The zeolites or other sorbents may provide anenvironment that may sorb and retain or hold the hazardous materials. Inone or more embodiments of the invention, the zeolites of the treatmentcomposition may initially be dehydrated or dried so that they may sorbmore water potentially laden with contaminants into their pores,although this is not required. In one or more embodiments of theinvention, the zeolites may be pre-treated to promote binding orretention of the hazardous materials, although this is not required. Asone example, a surfactant, such as, for example,hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, may be used to treat the zeolite tomake the internal cavities of the zeolite affinitive for anions insteadof cations. Treated and non-treated zeolites may be used for bothcations and anions. As another example, a chlorine compound, such as,for example, a perchlorinate, may be used to create a stationary solventphase in the cavities to customize sorption for organics. As anotherexample, a small molecular or ion trap may be included in the zeolites.As yet another example, sodium hydroxide may be used to open up theinternal structure, such as to facilitate sorption of larger molecules.

D. Growing Salt Crystals Around Sorbent

During the mixing period or process, salt of the treatment compositionmay start to form crystals that may grow in, on, and around, and coatparticles, agglomerates, or other portions of the zeolites and soil, atblock 340. Some of the salt materials may react with the surfaces of thesoil and zeolites to provide good contact and adhesion and the saltmaterials may grow as crystals between the soil and zeolites. The saltsmay become occluded into the growing matrix as anion and cation donors.Water having the salts therein may be drawn or sorbed into the pores ofthe zeolites and thereafter crystals may form in the pores or internalstructure to help seal the hazardous materials in the zeolites. This mayresult in an aggregate in which the crystals bound to the soil andzeolites form a coating, sheath, or encapsulation layer to helpencapsulate the hazardous materials within the cavities of the zeolite.This may tend to reduce leaching or removal of the hazardous materialsfrom the cavities of the zeolites. In some cases, ionic hazardousmaterials may potentially be incorporated directly in the salt crystalsby salt crystal formation reactions or by the salt crystals growingaround them, which may further help to contain these materials.

It is presently thought that excessive mixing may potentially tend toreduce the effectiveness of the containment of the hazardous materials.Without wishing to be bound by this particular theory, one potentialexplanation is that the chloride salts and other salts may be over mixedor “emulsified” with the soil, which may tend to hinder crystal growthand/or encapsulation of the hazardous materials within the cavities ofthe zeolites. Another potential explanation is that excessive mixing maypotentially break the salt crystals free of the zeolites.

E. Mixing Cement with Sorbent and Salt Crystal Mixture

Referring again to FIG. 3, after mixing the hazardous materials with thehazardous material treatment composition as described above, theresulting mixture or treated product may optionally be further treatedwith cement or another inorganic binding agent. The cement or otherinorganic binding agent may be mixed with the aforementioned resultingmixture, at block 350.

In various embodiments of the invention, the cement may be mixed in anamount that is from about 0.5 to 10 wt %, from about 0.5 to 5 wt %, orfrom about 1 to 3 wt % of the total volume of hazardous materialtreated, although the scope of the invention is not so limited. Morecement may also optionally be used, although this may tend to increasethe cost of treatment. The mixing may coat or otherwise provide thecement or other inorganic binding agent or composition around particles,clumps, or other portions of the zeolite, and growing and/or growncrystals.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the inorganic binding agentmay be introduced into the same mixer that already contains the mixturepreviously described. Alternatively, a different mixer may be used. Inone aspect, a first mixer to mix in the treatment composition and asecond mixer to mix in the lime and/or cement may be connected in serieswith one another to provide a continuous mixing process, which maypotentially help to reduce downtime needed to load and unload mixers.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the cement and/or lime maybe mixed with the treated hazardous material mixture for a period oftime ranging from about 30 seconds to 3 minutes, although this is notrequired. In aspects, the period of time may be less than 2 minutes, orless than 1 minute, although this is not required. It is presentlythought that excessive mixing may tend to disrupt the encapsulation orcontainment structure.

When adding the cement, or during the mixing period, the water contentin the mixer may optionally be adjusted to a value that is appropriateto promote formation of good hardened monolith. For example, in one ormore embodiments of the invention, an adjustment amount of water may beadded to give final water content is in the range of from about 14 to 18wt %. A deflocculaant such as sodium silicate may optionally be used toreduce amount of water or otherwise.

F. Hardening the Binding Agent Around Sorbent and Salt Crystals

Referring again to FIG. 3, the cement or other binding agent may harden,at block 360. As it hardens, the cement may provide a hard coating,sheath, or encapsulation layer around the particles, clumps, or otherportions of the zeolite, and growing and/or grown crystals, which mayfurther help to reduce leaching or other escape of the hazardousmaterial from the internal structures of the zeolites. The cement orother inorganic binding agent may also contribute solidity, mechanicalintegrity, and/or strength to the treated material. In some cases, heavymetals, ions, or other hazardous materials may be incorporated directlyin the cement potentially by cementitious reactions, which may furtherhelp to contain these materials.

G. Example Optional Variations of the Described Method

Various exemplary hazardous material treatment methods have beendescribed in conjunction with FIG. 3, although the scope of theinvention is not limited to just these particular methods. Alternatemethods are contemplated in which operations are performed in differentorder. For example, water may be combined after commencement of mixingof the hazardous material treatment composition and the hazardousmaterial. As another example, water may first be combined with the soilinstead of the treatment composition. Still alternate methods arecontemplated in which operations are added to the methods. For example,the unhardened cementitious mixture may be shaped or molded. As anotherexample, soil analysis may be performed and a treatment composition maybe tailored based on the soil analysis. Many further modifications andadaptations may be made to the methods and are contemplated.

IV. Exemplary Uses of the Treated Hazardous Materials

A. Soil Stabilization

One or more building codes, such as, for example, one or more regionalbuilding codes and/or the Universal Building Code, may govern thebuilding of structures on a particular soil or land. These codes mayspecify in part minimum compressive strength to support buildingsthereon. If the native compressive strength of the soil or land isinsufficient or too low, soil conditioning may be performed to increasethe compressive strength, so that building on the soil or land may bepermitted.

By way of example, a real estate developer or other entity may desire tobuild one or more buildings on land that is contaminated with ahazardous material, such as, for example, petroleum products,pesticides, mine tailings, or the like. Soil from the land may besampled and tested for compressive strength. In some cases, thecompressive strength of the native soil or land may also be lower thanthat required by one or more building codes in order for buildings orother structures to be constructed on the land.

In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, thehazardous material contaminating the land may be treated as disclosedelsewhere herein. In addition, in accordance with one or moreembodiments of the invention, the resulting treated hazardous materialmay be returned to the land and used for soil conditioning and/or toincrease the compressive strength of the soil or land upon which one ormore buildings are to be constructed or otherwise provided. A method,according to one or more embodiments of the invention, may includereturning treated contaminated soil including cement or other inorganicbinding agent back to the site to replace the contaminated soil that wasremoved in order to increase the compressive strength of the resultingsoil or land.

In one or more embodiments of the invention, the contaminated soil maybe treated with an amount of cement or other inorganic binding agentthat is sufficient to mechanically stabilize the soil concurrent withthe remediation. A greater amount of cement or other inorganic bindingagent generally provides a greater increase in the compression strengthof the soil. For example, in one or more embodiments of the invention,an amount of cement or other inorganic binding agent to be used fortreatment that would result in at least a specified, regulated, orotherwise predetermined compressive strength may be estimated,calculated, empirically measured, or otherwise determined based, atleast in part, on one or more, or both of, a measured native compressivestrength of the soil and/or one or more predetermined compressivestrengths specified by one or more building codes.

B. Forming Useful Shaped Objects or Products

In one or more embodiments of the invention, after mixing in the cement,lime, or other inorganic binding agent, but prior to hardening, themixture including the unhardened cement or other inorganic binding agentmay be molded or otherwise shaped and then hardened to form one or moreuseful molded or shaped objects or products. Examples of suitable usefulmolded or shaped objects or products include, but are not limited to,jersey barriers, sidewalk panels, bricks, cement pipes, housing siding,other building and construction materials, and other objects that willbe apparent to those skilled in the art and having the benefit of thepresent disclosure. Advantageously, building or construction materialsmay be formed on-site from on-site materials instead of having to behauled in. In one or more embodiments of the invention, a solid materialwith a lower density than water, such as, for example, Styrofoam, otherplastics, wood, or the like, may be used as a filler, in order to form aboat dock or other structure that may float. Alternatively, the materialmay be used for road base or the like. Advantageously, a contaminatedsoil or other contaminated material may be converted into a usefulobject or objects that may have some value and potential for use and/orresale.

V. Example Hazardous Material Treatment Compositions

As described above, in one or more embodiments of the invention, ahazardous material, such as, for example, contaminated soil andindustrial effluents or by-products, may be treated with a hazardousmaterial treatment composition containing salt and sorbent. A hazardousmaterial treatment composition, according to one or more embodiments ofthe invention, may include in relatively larger proportion or mostly asalt mixture and in relatively smaller proportion one or more sorbentsto sorb one or more hazardous materials. As used herein, mostly saltmeans more than 50% salt. By way of example, in one or more embodimentsof the invention, the hazardous material treatment composition mayinclude at least 75 wt % salt, such as, for example, from about 75 to99.5 wt % salt, and at least 0.5 wt % sorbent, such as, for example,from 0.5 to 25 wt % sorbent, although the scope of the invention is notso limited.

The inventor has considered numerous different possible treatmentcompositions, including compositions with varying amounts of variousdifferent types of salts, and different types of sorbents. This sectiondescribes various embodiments of hazardous material treatmentcompositions that may be used. However, the scope of the invention isnot limited to these particular treatment compositions. Many furthermodifications and variations of these treatment compositions arecontemplated and will be apparent to those skilled in the art and havingthe benefit of the present disclosure.

A suitable salt mixture, according to one or more embodiments of theinvention, may optionally include one or more halide salts, such as, forexample, one or more chloride salts, together with one or more sulfatesalts, although this is not required. The inclusion of both sulfate andhalide salts may allow encapsulating the zeolites within a matrix ofdifferent crystals formed integrally with one another which may tend toimprove encapsulation. The halide and sulfate salts may crystallize toform different crystal structures that may interlock and thereby help tocontain hazardous materials within a matrix. The sulfate salts may tendto promote formation of monoclinic crystals and other different crystalshapes, which may tend to add integrity to the salt crystals and promotegood encapsulation. One particular example of a suitable sulfate salt ismagnesium sulfate, although others are also suitable. Chloride saltstend to promote good and rapid crystal growth. In one or moreembodiments of the invention, the one or more halide salts mayoptionally include one or more monovalent cation salts, and one or morepolyvalent cation salts, although this is not required. Suitablemonovalent halide salts include, but are not limited to, sodiumchloride, ammonium chloride, potassium chloride, and the like. Suitablepolyvalent halide salts include, but are not limited to, calciumchloride, magnesium chloride, magnesium fluoride, and the like. In oneaspect, this may create different crystal structures that may adddiversity and interlock to aid containment. This may further promotecontainment of the hazardous materials within the confines of a matrixof inter-grown crystals and potentially help to reduce leaching ofhazardous materials.

One type of suitable sorbent is a zeolite. A zeolite may include anatural or synthetic hydrous silicate or aluminosilicate microporoussolid that may have a highly organized or structured openthree-dimensional crystal structure of openings and cavities in alattice. The zeolite may act as a molecular sieve, adsorbent, and/or ionexchanger to selectively sorb molecules and/or ions of suitable sizeinto the internal structure based, at least in part, on a size exclusionprocess and/or the chemical environment inside the cavities. Othersuitable sorbents include, but are not limited to, chelating agents, andother materials known to have binding or bonding properties with respectto known types of hazardous materials. Calcined clays, activatedcarbons, and like sorbents may also potentially be used in someembodiments depending upon the particular hazardous material andimplementation. For example, bentonite, illite and kaolin (allpotentially calcined) may potentially be used, depending upon theparticular implementation. Bentonite, illite and kaolin are alsoalumino-silicates. Combinations of different types of sorbents mayoptionally be included in the composition, such as, for example, to eachsorb different types of hazardous materials. The total sorbent includedin the composition may be based, at least in part, on the amount ofhazardous material to be sorbed. In various embodiments of theinvention, the total sorbent may be less than 15 wt %, less than 10 wt%, less than 5 wt %, and/or more than 0.5 wt %, although this is notrequired.

Other components may optionally be included in the hazardous materialtreatment composition. For example, magnesium may optionally be includedin order to help react with soil, or the like to help promote strong andintegral attachment of the crystals to the soil, although this is notrequired. A relatively higher soluble form of magnesium, such as, forexample, magnesium oxide, may optionally be included to increase theamount of soluble magnesium when the composition is combined with water.

As another example, the composition may optionally include one or morepH adjustment chemicals, such as, for example, sodium bicarbonate,sodium carbonate, potash, or another base, or a combination of bases, topromote a basic pH, although this is not required. A basic pH, such as,for example, a pH greater than 10, or greater than 11, or greater than12, may potentially help to avoid build up of hydrogen gas duringstorage. The high pH may also help to protect against unexpectedexposure to acid.

As yet another example, the composition may optionally include one ormore anti-corrosion chemicals or salts, such as, for example, aluminumchloride, although this is not required. The aluminum chloride may helpto reduce corrosion of steel and certain other metals. Aluminum chloridemay be included in various proportions in the composition depending uponwhether or not the potential for corrosion is of concern.

As a still further example, an indicator chemical or material mayoptionally be included in the composition to provide an aid for visuallyor otherwise assessing the degree of mixing of the mixture or thehomogeneity, although this is not required. Suitable indictor chemicalsor materials include, but are not limited to, potassium permanganate,dyes, ferromagnetic particles, or other materials whose relativeconcentration in the mixture may readily be assessed. These are just afew examples.

VI. Specific Examples of Suitable Hazardous Material TreatmentCompositions

An example of a suitable hazardous material treatment composition,according to one or more embodiments of the invention, is disclosed inTable 1. Components and concentrations are listed. TABLE 1 ComponentConcentration (wt %) Salt   75-99.5% Sorbent 0.05-25%

Another example of a suitable hazardous material treatment composition,according to one or more embodiments of the invention, is disclosed inTable 2. Components and concentrations are listed. TABLE 2 ComponentConcentration (wt %) Monovalent Halide Salt Remainder Polyvalent HalideSalt   0-35% Sulfate Salt   0-5% Anti-Corrosion Agent   0-5% MagnesiumOxide   0-5% Base Sufficient to give pH >10 Sorbent 0.5-25%

In various embodiments of the invention, from all to a small amount ofone or more, or various combinations, of the polyvalent halide salt, thesulfate salt, the anti-corrosion agent, and magnesium oxide, mayoptionally be omitted from the composition. The remaining percentage orbulk of the mixture may be made up of a monovalent halide salt, such as,for example, sodium chloride, which is widely available and relativelyinexpensive.

Yet another example of a suitable hazardous material treatmentcomposition, according to one or more embodiments of the invention, isdisclosed in Table 3. Components, concentrations, and optional particlesizes are listed. TABLE 3 Component Concentration (wt %) Particle SizeSodium Chloride Remainder 0-1 mm Ammonium Chloride 0-2% or about 1% 0-1mm Aluminum Chloride 0-5% or about 3% 0-1 mm Potassium Chloride 0-20% orabout 15% 0-1 mm or flocks Calcium Chloride 0-20% or about 15% 0-5 mmMagnesium Chloride 0-20% or about 15% fine grain or 50 mesh MagnesiumOxide 0-4% or about 2% −200 mesh Magnesium Sulfate 0-4% or about 3% 0-1mm Sodium Carbonate 0-4% or about 3% 0-1 mm Zeolite (ASM A4) 1-10% orabout 2-6% −325 mesh Potassium Permanganate 0-2% or about 0-1% 0-1 mm

In various embodiments of the invention, from all to a small amount ofone or more, or various combinations, of ammonium chloride, aluminumchloride, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride,magnesium oxide, magnesium sulfate, sodium bicarbonate, and potassiumpermanganate, may optionally be omitted from the composition. Theremaining percentage or bulk of the mixture may be made up of sodiumchloride.

A still further example of a suitable hazardous material treatmentcomposition, according to one or more embodiments of the invention, isdisclosed in Table 4. Components, concentrations, and optional particlesizes are listed. In this composition, the term “about” means ±50% ofthe indicated amount for indicated amounts that are less than 5% and±20% of the indicated amount for indicated amounts that are over 5%. Inthis composition, the remaining percentage or bulk of the mixture may bemade up of sodium chloride. Sodium chloride may be present in thehighest concentration. TABLE 4 Component Concentration (wt %) ParticleSize Sodium Chloride about 35% 0-1 mm Ammonium Chloride about 1% 0-1 mmAluminum Chloride about 3% 0-1 mm Potassium Chloride about 15% 0-1 mm orflocks Calcium Chloride about 15% 0-5 mm Magnesium Chloride about 15%fine grain or 50 mesh Magnesium Oxide about 2% −200 mesh MagnesiumSulfate about 3% 0-1 mm Sodium Carbonate about 3% 0-1 mm Zeolite (ASMA4) about 1-5% −325 mesh Potassium Permanganate about 0-1% 0-1 mm

Many other variations of the compositions included in Tables 1-4 arecontemplated and will be apparent to those skilled in the art and havingthe benefit of the present disclosure. For example, compositions arecontemplated that include additional components, omit one or more of thelisted components, and/or have the components in different proportions.The scope of the invention is not limited to any known composition.

Compositions like those shown above, or variations of thesecompositions, may include solid particulate materials or powders thatmay be mixed or otherwise combined together in the indicatedproportions. The resulting mixtures may optionally be sealed in acontainer or otherwise packaged and optionally stored until an intendedtime of use.

VII. Optionally Tailoring Hazardous Material Treatment Compositions toParticular Hazardous Materials

The hazardous material treatment compositions disclosed above aresuitable for treating a wide variety of contaminated soils. However, inone or more embodiments of the invention, a hazardous material treatmentcomposition may optionally be altered and/or tailored for a particularcontaminated soil based, at least in part, on analysis of soil andcontaminant properties. Initially, a contaminated soil sample may becollected and analyzed. By way of example, the soil may be analyzed forwater content, organic content, hazardous material type, hazardousmaterial content, electrical conductivity, compressive strength, pH,salt content, and optionally other parameters. The hazardous materialtreatment composition may be formed or modified based at least in parton the analysis. By way of example, the type of zeolite or other sorbentmay be determined based on the type of hazardous material, the amount ofzeolite or other sorbent may be determined based on the amount ofhazardous material, the amount of water needed for addition to thehazardous material treatment composition may be determined based on theamount of water in the soil, the amount of cement to add may potentiallybe based in part on the compressive strength, and/or the amount of saltin the composition may potentially be based on the amount of salt in thesoil. Such adaptations may potentially improve treatment, but are notrequired. Leaching tests may also optionally be formed on treatedsamples prior to large-scale remediation treatment. However, suchtailoring of the treatment composition is optional and not required.Pre-packaged general-purpose treatment compositions may also optionallybe used.

VIII. Examples

Having been generally described, the following examples are given asparticular embodiments of the invention, to illustrate some of theproperties and demonstrate the practical advantages thereof, and toallow one skilled in the art to utilize the invention. It is understoodthat these examples are to be construed as merely illustrative.

EXAMPLE 1

Experiments have been performed to demonstrate that treatment asdisclosed herein may significantly increase the compressive strength ofsoil. A sample of soil was treated with a hazardous material treatmentcomposition similar to that shown in Table 4. The volume ratio of soilto treatment composition was on the order of 1:10. About 2.5 wt %Portland cement was used. The compressive strength measurements weremade using ASTM C-39. The results indicated that the compressivestrength of the treated soil increased over time. After several days,the compressive strength of the treated soil was generally found to begreater than about 80 psi, which is significantly greater than thecompressive strength of the original soil before treatment.

EXAMPLE 2

This example demonstrates the effectiveness of treating variouscontaminated samples with treatment compositions and methods asdisclosed herein. The samples were treated using compositions similar tothose disclosed in Table 4 using methods similar to those disclosedherein. Leaching was assessed by method EPA 1311. Results are listed inTable 5. TABLE 5 HARDNESS (COMPRSSION LEACHING LEACHING STRENGTH)DESCRIPTION BEFORE AFTER AFTER OF SAMPLE Contaminant TREATMENT TREATMENTTREATMENT Tar laden clay Antimony  42.5 ug/g  0.09 ug/l  1.8 MPa soilArsenic   115 ug/g  0.03 ug/l Lead   625 ug/g Non Detectable Mod. TPH130000 Non Detectable Alkaline clay Benzene 0.072 mg/l 0.021 mg/l 1.65MPa soil Toluene    0.142   0.030 Xylene    0.009 <0.002 Ethylbenzene   0.088   0.018Method: EPA 1311

As shown the leaching after the treatment was in all cases reducedcompared to leaching before treatment. Also, significant increase incompressive strength is obtained after treatment. Similar reductions inleaching and increases in compressive strength are reasonably expectedfor a wide variety of hazardous materials if treated as disclosedherein.

IX. Other Matters

In the following description and claims, the terms “coupled” and“connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should beunderstood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other.Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicatethat two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contactwith each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are indirect physical or electrical contact. However, “coupled” may also meanthat two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, butyet still co-operate or interact with each other.

In the description above, for the purposes of explanation, numerousspecific details have been set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the embodiments of the invention. It will be apparenthowever, to one skilled in the art, that one or more other embodimentsmay be practiced without some of these specific details. The particularembodiments described are not provided to limit the invention but toillustrate it. The scope of the invention is not to be determined by thespecific examples provided above but only by the claims below. In otherinstances, well-known structures, devices, and operations have beenshown in block diagram form or without detail in order to avoidobscuring the understanding of the description.

It will also be appreciated, by one skilled in the art, thatmodifications may be made to the embodiments disclosed herein, such as,for example, to the sizes, configurations, functions, materials, andmanner of operation of the components of the embodiments. All equivalentrelationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in thespecification are encompassed within embodiments of the invention.

Various operations and methods have been described. Some of the methodshave been described in a basic form, but operations may optionally beadded to and/or removed from the methods. The operations of the methodsmay also often optionally be performed in different order. Manymodifications and adaptations may be made to the methods and arecontemplated.

For clarity, in the claims, any element that does not explicitly state“means for” performing a specified function, or “step for” performing aspecified function, is not to be interpreted as a “means” or “step”clause as specified in 35 U.S.C. Section 112, Paragraph 6. Inparticular, any potential use of “step of” in the claims herein is notintended to invoke the provisions of 35 U.S.C. Section 112, Paragraph 6.

It should also be appreciated that reference throughout thisspecification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, or “one or moreembodiments”, for example, means that a particular feature may beincluded in the practice of the invention. Similarly, it should beappreciated that in the description various features are sometimesgrouped together in a single embodiment, Figure, or description thereoffor the purpose of streamlining the disclosure and aiding in theunderstanding of various inventive aspects. This method of disclosure,however, is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that theinvention requires more features than are expressly recited in eachclaim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects maylie in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus,the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expresslyincorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing onits own as a separate embodiment of the invention.

Accordingly, while the invention has been thoroughly described in termsof several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that theinvention is not limited to the particular embodiments described, butmay be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit andscope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded asillustrative instead of limiting.

1-17. (canceled)
 18. A composition comprising: at least 75 wt % salt,the salt including: monovalent cation halide salt; polyvalent cationhalide salt; sulfate salt; and magnesium salt; 0.5 to 15 wt % sorbent;and a sufficient amount of base to give the composition a pH greaterthan
 10. 19. The composition of claim 18, further comprising: sodiumchloride present in highest concentration; an anti-corrosion agent; from1 to 5 wt % sorbent, wherein the sorbent comprises zeolite.
 20. Thecomposition of claim 18, further comprising contaminated soil and aninorganic binding agent mixed with the salt, the sorbent, and the base.